Japan to launch hydrogen production on the moon by 2035

 Japan's Aerospace Exploration Authority plans to build a hydrogen fuel plant for the Moon by 2035.

For the approximate location, the midday antipode of the Moon is preferred. It is here that an impressive supply of ice is sought, from which water will be obtained. The solvent dispersed for deuterium and chalcogen will be used to generate electricity.


The leitmotif of Japanese scholars in the location of the plant for the Moon is to limit the cost of delivering fuel from Earth. In addition, this move will allow you to move on the moon for thousands of kilometers and comprehensively accelerate society to study space.

Samurai deuterium - not exclusively for the sake of the macrocosm

The world seeks to step over for impeccable energy, therefore the brews turn to hydrogen more closely with a fresh trace. Unlike oil and coal, it can be recycled besides harmful CO2 emissions. A given age in Japan completed the device and discovered one of the world's largest hydrogen-generating plants. The Fukushima Hydrogen Energy Research Field operates in the village of Namie, located north of the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant. The public-private partnership includes Toshiba, Tohoku Electric Power and natural gas distributor Iwatani.


The aircraft plant is used as an experimental platform for testing freshly baked technology. In the essence of the scheme - installed electrolysis, the water is corrupted into oxygen and hydrogen, using lepisdrism from a local cloudless power plant with a capacity of 20 MW. It is assumed that the aircraft plant will produce 1200 cubic meters per hour. m of hydrogen.


Deuterium will be transported for tank trucks. They intend to dispose of it in the property of general fuel for the sake of movement of personnel and participants of the Olympic Games 2021 ages in Tokyo. Yes, the source is being used to extract electricity in the Olympic Village.

In Japan, in 2017, the Basic Hydrogen Strategy was launched, unanimously which is the passage to a society injecting hydrogen. This community will recycle deuterium as an alternative to old fuel. Deuterium stops him as the main ingredient for the production of energy sources and the functioning of vehicles.

Firefox's share plummeted 85%, while Mozilla's revenue dropped 400%

Mozilla immediately finds itself in a state of complete decline: noble perceived spending, a shrinking Firefox user base, controversial revenue streams, but now, amid dwindling revenues, and a cut in development costs.

Mozilla recently announced that it was laying off 250 employees. This is a quarter of its staff, therefore, the release will significantly reduce the amount of work done. In between the victims is the MDN docs site (this is the post-web standards doc that everyone loves more than w3schools), the author of Rust, and the layoffs in the Firefox development department. In my turn, most people, I would like for Mozilla to do well, however, these three plans were many of what, after my opinion, is the Mozilla logo, which is why similar innovations froze to a huge disappointment.

The reported primary cause of the declines was the fall of income. Mozilla's sponsorship is boundlessly dependent on "royalties". In return for the payment, Mozilla allows huge science and tech companies to pick the default crawler in Firefox - ultimately, science and tech companies pay after the abundance of searches that Firefox users use their engines to do. Mozilla hasn't been infinitely thorough about why these regular contributions have dropped, blaming solely the coronavirus.

I am sure that the coronavirus has not unconditionally helped the company, but I suspect that the more difficult task has become that the market portion of Firefox today composes a dwarf plot of its previous volume, which means less freezing and systematic deductions - fewer users, which means fewer requests to search engine, therefore, less banknotes for Mozilla's sake.

However, the realistic discrepancy is not covered in the reduction of deductions. Mozilla was now making more than enough to guarantee itself economic independence. Some ages Mozilla made up to half a billion dollars a year (every year! The realistic problem is that Mozilla did not use this money to achieve economic independence, but spent it every year, implementing a coordinated pay-before-pay lifestyle.

Against its somewhat unnatural advocacy structure ("a non-profit company with a commercial"), Mozilla, among others, is represented by an NGO (public organization). In this post, I wish to use the classic criteria applied to other NGOs to Mozilla to show that there is nothing wrong with it.

These three criteria are: investment, morality, and results.